|
|
| April 10th, 2006 by Godfre Leung (Permalink) Add Comments |
Television Personalities My Dark Places (Domino, 2006)
I was recently standing puzzled in front of a Cy Twombly painting at the Museum of Modern Art in New York. I’ve always struggled with Twombly’s work because of its lack of composition. The all-over nature of certain of Twombly’s paintings doesn’t work for me the way the all-over nature of Jackson Pollock’s or, even, Jean-Michel Basquiat’s paintings work in relation to the internal logic of the canvas. Television Personalities’ new album, My Dark Places, seems to lack the same unifying element as the Twombly painting, though, in TVP’s case, the disorder actually works.
A friend of mine was trying to explain to me his appreciation of the Twombly painting in front of us. For him, the lack of a unified composition tore apart the limits of the canvas, opening up a new way to understand pictorial space. Looking at the painting, I couldn’t accept this utopian reading of Twombly just as I never bought a certain well-known art historian’s contention that Pollock’s drip paintings democratized the canvas by eliminating the hierarchical relationship between elements within a painting. For me, the non-hierarchical surface of the drip paintings is undone by the paintings’ projection of a hierarchical relationship between the painter and the canvas. That is, more so than any other painting before them, Pollock’s drip paintings emphasized the canvas as a receptacle for the painter’s “action.” These paintings sexualize the relationship between painter and canvas and, in so doing, position painting as an act of virility and enforce the domination of women in a neat little tautology. There is a reason that all painting after abstract-expressionism either embraced craft, design, and the feminine (minimalism, post-minimalism, and Daniel Buren), wasn’t really painting at all (pop, Gerhard Richter, and Buren again), or was highly suspect. The Twombly painting’s lack of composition does little in its lack of organization to work through the sexualization of the canvas after abstract-expressionism. Rather, its all-over effect acts to relegate the canvas as a space of sexual availability — put it anywhere you want, Jack.
The canon of macho rock criticism has historically privileged the album over the single or the individual track. For the Christgaus of the world, the album, because of its “fully conceptualized” nature, bears an authenticity that the hit single, which is by its nature instantaneous and catchy (read: seductive), does not. The feminine charms of, say, “These Boots are Made for Walkin’,” “The Leader of the Pack,” or “Jenny from the Block” are no match for the muscular conceptual aplomb of Zeppelin IV. Case in point, album oriented women like Joni Mitchell and Patti Smith are “artists” while a group with a back catalogue of indelibly relevant singles as impressive and unparalleled as the Supremes are merely “singers.” But do any of us still care what the boys at Rolling Stone think? If it were up to Dan Treacy of Television Personalities, we wouldn’t. Where My Dark Places succeeds while Twombly fails is in the former’s de-gendering of its relationship to its medium.
The bands of the Pop Résistance have often attempted to work through the problem of gender in pop music by embracing the feminine. Bands like Tiger Trap and Beat Happening made their cult status on this feminization. Television Personalities, whose influence is arguably a common denominator between most, if not all, of the bands of the Pop Résistance, have always worked towards a post-gendered pop music.
One of these “other ways” has been to adopt femininity as a pose. If punk rock, as Calvin Johnson once said to me, is all about posing, then why not do away with the Sid Vicious nihilistic boy-punk pose and embrace the feminine? In addition to Calvin and sensitive-but-only-half-seriously-sensitive boys like him, female dominated groups like Talulah Gosh and Heavenly, Cub, the aforementioned Tiger Trap, and, in more recent years, Gentle Waves have embraced clichés of femininity with great success. How Television Personalities stand out is their refusal of gender clichés — I am reminded again of X Ray Spex and their “I am a Cliché.” Songs like “Games for Boys” and “Geoffrey Ingram” deal with a profound alienation from traditional gender roles but, for Treacy, the alternative is not to adopt the opposite gender role. That too would be alienating. Just as he finds another way to “mean it” when presented with Joe Strummer’s barking, working class hero pose, Treacy finds a way to avoid playing Joe Strummer that doesn’t involve sitting cross-legged and knitting like sensitive boys are still doing in the Pacific Northwest (not that there’s anything wrong with that).
In the beginning, Television Personalities’ music was as indebted to the softer strains of British Psychedelia and the Kinks as it was to punk rock. Treacy’s singing style has always been most of all reminiscent of We are the Village Green Preservation Society-era Ray Davies. As Treacy, like his idol Syd Barrett, went further and further off the deep end, both artistically and in his personal life, Television Personalities songs went from neat little self-contained pop songs to meandering, unfocused compositions. They were, to be sure, still pop songs, but with the sense that Treacy was making it up as he went along. The difficulty of these songs, then, was not so much in their structure (like, for example, the difficulty of the Fiery Furnaces) but in their complete lack of structure. Which brings us, finally, to My Dark Places.
While Television Personalities have been making an aesthetic of releasing overly long and unfocused albums since the early 90’s, there’s something of Daniel Johnston and another album recently released by Domino, the reissue of Sebadoh III, in My Dark Places. It would be altogether too simple to attribute the constant threat of falling apart in My Dark Places to Dan Treacy’s loosened tether to mental clarity. Critics often make a virtue of the less coherent aspects of Daniel Johnston’s work for this very reason. For these condescending critics, there is an “honesty” to Johnston’s songs because, as a schizophrenic, he doesn’t know any better; he’s an accidental “genius,” an idiot savant. But, to be fair, these guys are extremely bright artists who know what they’re doing. No more than Van Gogh’s paintings were a product of his madness, My Dark Places is not a document of Treacy’s on 5″ disc. (Did anyone accuse the Beatles of schizophrenia after the White Album? It was, after all, Brian Wilson, he of the groundbreakingly unified and self-contained Pet Sounds, who suffered from schizophrenia.) Rather, we should understand the schizophrenic nature of My Dark Places as part of a project to reconceptualize what it means to create an album.
While reports have it that Treacy is indeed still off his nut, what we encounter on My Dark Places is a character’s struggle with narrative coherence. Treacy keeps inserting outside voices to disrupt his (character’s) narrative and, at many points in My Dark Places, the listener is made to ask, “Who is speaking?” The answer? To quote Foucault quoting Beckett (who is speaking indeed), “What does it matter who is speaking?” Which is to say that the album asks us why we seek coherence in albums; what do we gain from being able to imagine a stable figure behind the songs? My Dark Places enacts this working through of narrative coherence in the album through this character, this disembodied voice onto which we as listeners project a backstory, and his attempt to sing songs that not only appear constantly on the verge of falling apart but whose backup singers often go from backing him up to talking to him, confronting him, and destroying him.
And the music? The greatness of the Replacements’ Let it Be, it has often been said, was that it captured a volatile band always on the brink of falling apart. My Dark Places is a far cry from the Replacements, to be sure. What we get, though, is sixteen great pop songs that could very well, had Television Personalities the inclination, sound like a Cinerama album. What makes these songs interesting, however, is the way the band plays with them, subverting the listener’s conventional enjoyment of the songs. I have already mentioned the way the backup vocals turn against and subsequently undo the album’s narrator. On “Velvet Underground,” the band builds the song, whose lyrics are about the originality of the Velvet Underground’s music, around the kind of standard pre-programmed rockabilly bassline you would normally find on a Casio keyboard, only, instead of incorporating Casiotone as many faux-naïf pop bands are content to do, the band plays the bassline and stock drumbeat using an actual bass guitar and drums. On the title track, the band sings “My dark places, my dark places,” presumably the emotional center of the album, to the tune of “Frère Jacques,” blocking the listener’s emotional identification with the singer, who isn’t really even singing his own song. The final track, “There’s No Beautiful Way to Say Goodbye,” an affecting piano ballad, is subverted throughout with intentionally unsophisticated keywork until, toward the end of the song, the piano fades out as Treacy engages in a desperate lovesick rant.
Perhaps most exemplary of the album as a whole, the track “Ex-Girlfriend Club” is a psychodrama about just what its title suggests. The song barely holds together, with seemingly improvised instrumentation (piano, trumpet, bass drum) based very loosely around a tune. In the middle of the song, for no apparent reason, a drum machine kicks in as the song’s key changes for a few bars from minor to major and the piano repeats an ascending and descending scale. Later in the song, the piano plays, almost unnoticeably given the formlessness of the composition, the melody from the chorus of J-Lo’s “Jenny from the Block.” Several bars afterwards, Treacy sings, “Don’t be fooled by the rocks/I’m still Danny from the block.” The reference is to Treacy’s drug addiction and subsequent incarceration. My Dark Places, Television Personalities’ first album in eight years — due, in large part, to said addiction and incarceration — is fucking with us. Because there are many among us who expected nothing less than a crashing and burning conceptual mess, Treacy gave us one. By insistently enacting an inability to maintain a coherent narrative singing voice, My Dark Places denies itself a stable subject position from which to speak and, in so doing, Television Personalities becomes neither masculine nor feminine. I won’t be so bold as to declare this a sufficiently post-gendered pop music, but it’s certainly a formidable step in the right direction.
Purchase or search for related items:

August 2nd, 2006 at 9:59 pm
[…] For me, the appeal of the Pipettes is conceptual. They are a pretty good retro girl-group outfit, but Saturday Looks Good to Me writes more formally interesting songs and the Aislers Set sounds more authentic. The Pipettes’ appropriation of girl-group pop seems to me a critical move in the tradition of late 80’s and 90’s indiepop bands, particularly Talulah Gosh and Heavenly, who take aim at the idea of rock and roll as the authentic counterpoint to artificial and manufactured feminized pop music. (I have written about Television Personalities’ reaction to the same phenomenon.) Where Talulah Gosh’s “I Can’t Get No Satisfaction, Thank God” and Heavenly’s “Cool Guitar Boy” ask the question, “What makes the Rolling Stones serious music?”, the Pipettes ask the same question of Gang of Four. To be sure, “I Like a Boy in Uniform” is more serious than Franz Ferdinand and makes it plain for all to see. […]